Commissioner Of Income-Tax-I, Nagpur v. Mukesh Dedutta Gupta, Nagpur
High Court
03 Sep 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax-I, Nagpur v. Mukesh Dedutta Gupta, Nagpur
Date of order
03 Sep 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax-I, Nagpur v. Mukesh Dedutta Gupta, Nagpur, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is a question raised in this appeal.
Decision: The Income-Tax appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
0309itl76.09.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
INCOME-TAX APPEAL NO. 76 OF 2009
(Commissioner of Income-Tax-I, Nagpur Vs. Mukesh Dedutta Gupta, Nagpur)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr. Anand Parchure, Advocate for the appellant.
CORAM: J. P. DEVADHAR & A. B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.DATED: 03RD SEPTEMBER, 2010.
Whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is a question raised in this appeal.
The Tribunal deleted the penalty firstly on the ground that the assessee had filed return pursuant to notice under Section 153-A of the Income Tax Act offering additional income with a view to buy peace & on the understanding that no penalty would be levied. Having accepted the return subject to conditions attached to it, imposition of penalty was not justified. Secondly, in the case of group concern, penalty in the case of Padmesh Gupta and Gupta Leasing & Finance Ltd. has been deleted and the Revenue has accepted the decision of the Tribunal by not filing any further appeal. In the absence of any distinguishing facts, deletion of the penalty cannot be faulted.
The Income-Tax appeal is dismissed.
JUDGE JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.