Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Pune v. Satyanarayan Ramswaroop Agarwal
High Court
11 Mar 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Pune v. Satyanarayan Ramswaroop Agarwal
Date of order
11 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Pune v. Satyanarayan Ramswaroop Agarwal, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: 4.Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 206 OF 2015
Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Pune
Versus
Satyanarayan Ramswaroop Agarwal
..Appellant
..Respondent
...................
Mr. Sham Walve for the Appellant
...................
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN &
MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 11, 2021.
P.C.:
Heard Mr. Sham Walve, learned standing counselrevenue for the appellant.
2.Mr. Walve submits on instructions that the tax effect in
this appeal is Rs. 58.52 lacs which is less than the prescribedlimit of Rs. one crore in terms of CBDT Circular No. 17/2019dated 8.8.2019.
3.In view of the above, he seeks leave to withdraw theappeal.
4.Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
5.Court fees deposited to be refunded as per rules.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ]
Digitally signedRavindraby Ravindra M.M.AmberkarDate:Amberkar2021.03.1510:11:17 +0530
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue