Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Tiruchirapalli. Appellant v. Shri B.murugesh Respondent
High Court
10 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Tiruchirapalli. Appellant v. Shri B.murugesh Respondent
Date of order
10 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
2006-2007
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Tiruchirapalli. Appellant v. Shri B.murugesh Respondent, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be lessthan the monetary limit imposed and, therefore, the appeal filedby the Revenue is dismissed, as not pressed, keeping open thesubstantial question of law for determination in appropriatecases.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARIANDTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
Tax Case Appeal No.1448 of 2010
Commissioner of Income Tax-I,Tiruchirapalli.Appellant / RespondentVs.
Shri B.MurugeshRespondent / Appellant
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income TaxAct, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Chennai 'D' Bench, dated 09.07.2010, made in ITANo.567/Mds/2010, against the order of the Commissioner of IncomeTax (Appeals), Trichy dated 04/02/2010 made in ITA No.563/08-09against the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle II, Trichydated 26/12/2018, Assessment year 2006-2007.
For Appellant : Mr.M.Swaminathan, Senior Standing Counsel. For respondent : Mr.Venkatanarayanan, for M/s.Subbraya Aiyar PadmanabhanJ U D G M E N T
(Delivered by DR.VINEET KOTHARI,J.)
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue, callingin question the correctness of the order passed by the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'D' Bench, dated 09.07.2010, inITA No.567/Mds/2010, by raising the following substantialquestion of law :
" Whether on the facts and in the circumstancesof the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal wasright in holding that the assessee was entitled fordepreciation at the rate of 40% applicable towindmills even on the electrical fittings and civilwork, on which depreciation was allowable only atthe rate of 5% ?
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learnedStanding Counsel for the Department brought to our notice theCircular instruction issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxesvide Circular No.3/2018, dated 11.7.2018, wherein, it isstipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by theDepartment before the High Court in cases where the tax effectdoes not exceed Rs.50.00 lakhs.
3. In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be lessthan the monetary limit imposed and, therefore, the appeal filedby the Revenue is dismissed, as not pressed, keeping open thesubstantial question of law for determination in appropriatecases. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant RegistrardixitTo1)The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai -D- Bench, Chennai.2)The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), No.44, Williams Road, Cantonment,Trichy - 620 001.3)The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle II, No.44, Williams Road, Cantonment,Trichy - 620 001.
+1 cc to Mr.M.Swaminathan, Advocate, S.R.No.2661
+1 cc to Mr.Subbaraya Aiyar, Advocate, S.R.No.3491
VG-II(CO)SSM(18/03/2019)
TCA No.1448 OF 2010
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.