Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax- I v. America...

Commissioner Of Income Tax- I v. American Express Services India Ltd

High Court 23 May 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax- I v. American Express Services India Ltd
Date of order
23 May 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax- I v. American Express Services India Ltd, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 4. + ITA 336/2016 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- I ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P. Roy Chaudhuri, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Junior Standing counsel. versus AMERICAN EXPRESS SERVICES INDIA LTD ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 23.05.2016 CM 19819 of 2016(for delay in filing the appeal) 1. For the reasons stated therein, the delay of 11 days in filing the appeal is condoned. The application is allowed. -CM No. 19818 of 2016(for condonation of delay in refiling the appeal)&ITA No. 336 of 2016 2. There is a delay of 1405 days in re-filing the appeal. 3. The explanation offered is the standard one regarding the practice directions issued by this Court for e-filing of the appeals. As has already been observed by this Court in several orders, the practice directions were ITA No.336/2016 Page 1 of 2 issued after consultation with the Bar and after giving sufficient time for the Bar to get acquainted with the requirement of e-filing. Additionally, the Court has also provided scanning machines at the filing counter so that no difficulty is caused to the Bar for switching over to the system of e-filing. In any event, the delay of more than three years on this ground is wholly unacceptable. Consequently, the Court is not persuaded to condone the extraordinary delay of 1405 days in re-filing the appeal. 4. The application bearing CM No.19818 of 2016 seeking condonation of the extraordinary delay of 1405 days in re-filing the appeal is dismissed. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J MAY 23, 2016 mg VIBHU BAKHRU, J ITA No.336/2016 Page 2 of 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan