Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. Anupam S...

Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. Anupam Silk Mills Private Ltd

High Court 17 Sep 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. Anupam Silk Mills Private Ltd
Date of order
17 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. Anupam Silk Mills Private Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Tax Appeals are therefore, dismissed only on this ground.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1331 of 2011 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1333 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1334 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1360 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1420 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1430 of 2011With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 50 of 2012With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 89 of 2012With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 456 of 2012With R/TAX APPEAL NO.457 of 2012With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 458 of 2012With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 530 of 2012With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 538 of 2012With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 541 of 2012With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 640 of 2012With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 642 of 2012With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 679 of 2012With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 744 of 2012With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 745 of 2012With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 746 of 2012With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 826 of 2012With C/TAXAP/1331/2011 ORDER R/TAX APPEAL NO. 878 of 2012With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 879 of 2012With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 190 of 2013With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 353 of 2013With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 585 of 2013With R/TAX APPEAL NO.686 of 2013With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 787 of 2013With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 792 of 2013With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 871 of 2013With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 961 of 2013With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 962 of 2013With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 963 of 2013With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 964 of 2013With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1036 of 2013With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 332 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 594 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 617 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 875 of 2014 ==========================================================COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IVersusANUPAM SILK MILLS PRIVATE LTD ========================================================== Appearance:MRS KALPANAK RAVAL for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1MRS MAUNA BHATT, for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1MR VARUN K PATEL for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1MR TUSHAR P HEMANI(2790) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. MS VAIBHAVI K PARIKH(3238) for the RESPONDENT(s) No.MR MANISH J SHAH for the RESPONDENT(s) No. MR BS SOPARKAR for the RESPONDENT(s) No. MR RK PATEL for the RESPONDENT(s) No. MR TEJ SHAH for the RESPONDENT(s) No. ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA Date : 17/09/2018 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) We are informed that the tax effect involved in these appeals filed by the Revenue is below the minimum threshold prescribed by CBDT in its latest circular dated 11.7.2018 to enable the Revenue to maintain appeals before the High Court. Tax Appeals are therefore, dismissed only on this ground. (AKIL KURESHI, J) K.K. SAIYED (B.N. KARIA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan