In Commissioner Of Income Tax- I v. Bloom Dekor Ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: Tax Appeals are disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/TAXAP/26/2014 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 26 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1001 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1118 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1137 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1138 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1139 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1140 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1176 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1222 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1262 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1351 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1361 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 174 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 340 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 40 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 591 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 593 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 628 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 870 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 880 of 2014With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 881 of 2014
==========================================================
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- IVersusBLOOM DEKOR LTD
==========================================================
Appearance:
MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1MR. JAIMIN R DAVE(7022) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA4[th] September 2018andHONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA4[th] September 2018
ORAL ORDER(PER : HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
Learned advocate Ms. Mauna Bhatt, under instructions from the Department, sought permission to withdraw these appeals since the tax effect involved in these appeals is below the minimum threshold limit provided by the CBDT in its Circular dated 11.07.2018 enabling the Department to prefer and maintain appeals before the High Court.
Permission is granted. Tax Appeals are disposed of accordingly.
Prakash
[Akil Kureshi, J.][B.N Karia, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.