Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S Bhar...

Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S Bharat Aluminium Co. Ltd

High Court 04 Apr 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

04 Apr 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S Bharat Aluminium Co. Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 36. + ITA 228/2016 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ..... Appellant Through: Mr Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing counsel with Mr Sanjay Kumar, Junior Standing counsel. versus M/S BHARAT ALUMINIUM CO. LTD ..... Respondent CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 04.04.2016 -CM No.12381/2016 (for condonation of delay in refiling the appeal) &ITA 228/2016 1. There is a delay of 840 days in re-filing the appeal. 2. The explanation offered is the standard one regarding the practice directions issued by this Court for e-filing of the appeals. As has already been observed by this Court in several orders, the practice directions were issued after consultation with the bar and after giving sufficient time for the bar to get acquainted with the requirement of e-filing. Additionally, the Court has also provided scanning machines at the filing counter so that no difficulty is caused to the bar for switching over to the system of e-filing. In any event, the delay of over two years on this ground is wholly ITA 228/2016 Page 1 of 2 unacceptable. Consequently, the Court is not persuaded to condone the extraordinary delay of 840 days in re-filing the appeal. 3. The application bearing CM No.12381/2016 for condonation of the delay of 840 days in re-filing the appeal is dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J APRIL 04, 2016 MK VIBHU BAKHRU, J ITA 228/2016 Page 2 of 2

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.