Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. Textile Cooperative Bank Of Surat Limited ==========================================================
High Court
20 Oct 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. Textile Cooperative Bank Of Surat Limited ==========================================================
Date of order
20 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. Textile Cooperative Bank Of Surat Limited ==========================================================, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/TAX APPEAL NO. 841 of 2009
==========================================================
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I Versus
TEXTILE COOPERATIVE BANK OF SURAT LIMITED ==========================================================
Appearance:MR. NIKUNT RAVAL for MRS KALPANAK RAVAL(1046) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR BANDISH SOPARKAR for MRS SWATI SOPARKAR(870) for the Opponent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANIandHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
Date : 20/10/2021 ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI)
1.The captioned appeal concerns the low tax effect. Theappeal is to be disposed of keeping in mind the CircularNo.17/2019, dated 8[th] August, 2019 issued by the Governmentof India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, CentralBoard Direct Taxes, New Delhi.
2. This tax appeal is not pressed in view of the low taxeffect having regard to the Circular No.17/2019, dated 8thAugust, 2019 issued by the Government of India, Ministry ofFinance, Department of Revenue, Central Board Direct Taxes,New Delhi.
3. According to the new policy as reflected from the
Circular referred to above, the table for monetary limits is asfollows:
4. Since the amount of penalty involved in the present appeal
is Rs. 34,40,000/-, in view of the aforesaid, the appeal isdisposed of accordingly.
5.In case of any difficulty, we reserve the liberty for theRevenue to revive the tax appeal.
(SONIA GOKANI, J)
Bhoomi
(HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.