Commissioner Of Income Tax Ichennai v. M/. Vanavil Dyes & Chemicals Ltd.,(Now Known As Clariant Chemicals Ltd.,)Ii Floor Kences Towers, Ramakrishna St.,T.nagar, Chennai β 600 017
High Court
04 Nov 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax Ichennai v. M/. Vanavil Dyes & Chemicals Ltd.,(Now Known As Clariant Chemicals Ltd.,)Ii Floor Kences Towers, Ramakrishna St.,T.nagar, Chennai β 600 017
Date of order
04 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
β
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax Ichennai v. M/. Vanavil Dyes & Chemicals Ltd.,(Now Known As Clariant Chemicals Ltd.,)Ii Floor Kences Towers, Ramakrishna St.,T.nagar, Chennai β 600 017, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal under Section 263, Section 260A of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Recording the aforesaid submission, this tax case appeal is dismissed as withdrawn on account of low tax effect leaving the question of law open to be decided in an appropriate matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below β read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order β as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.11.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICEANITA SUMANTHandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN
T.C.A.No.242 of 2011
Commissioner of Income Tax IChennai.
.. Appellant
vs
M/. Vanavil Dyes & Chemicals Ltd.,(now known as Clariant Chemicals Ltd.,)II Floor Kences Towers, Ramakrishna St.,T.Nagar, Chennai β 600 017.
.. Respondent
Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras, 'C' Bench, dated 19.10.2010 in ITA No. 817/Mds/2010.
For Appellant :Mr.J.NarayanaswamySenior Standing Counsel
For Respondent:No appearance
DR. ANITA SUMANTH.,J.andG. ARUL MURUGAN.,J.
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J)
This tax case appeal relates to assessment year (AY) 1999 β 2000. The challenge is to order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 19.10.2010 confirming the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 in respect of assessment year 1999-2000.
2.On instructions, Mr.J.Narayanasamy, learned Senior Standing Counsel, appearing for the appellant/Department states that tax effect has been computed at a sum of Rs.26,00,000/- (approx) hence and citing the instructions per Circular bearing No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024, he does not pursue the appeal.
3. Recording the aforesaid submission, this tax case appeal is dismissed as withdrawn on account of low tax effect leaving the question of law open to be decided in an appropriate matter. No costs.
Index:Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/Nossm
T.C.A.No.242 of 2011
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CAβclient relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.