Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Jabalpur...

Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Jabalpur v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Chaakghaat

High Court 11 Feb 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Jabalpur v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Chaakghaat
Date of order
11 Feb 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Jabalpur v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Chaakghaat, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Chaakghaat 11/02/2014 Shri Sanjeev Tuli, learned counsel for the appellant.The question proposed by the revenue in this appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act is, as to whether the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, a statutory Samiti formulated under the Madhya Pradesh Kri...

Decision: The appeal is accordingly, dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

I.T.A.No.12/2009 Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Jabalpur Vs. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Chaakghaat 11/02/2014 Shri Sanjeev Tuli, learned counsel for the appellant.The question proposed by the revenue in this appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act is, as to whether the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, a statutory Samiti formulated under the Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Adhiniyam is an institute created for charitable purpose and is entitled for registration under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act. The question proposed in this appeal has already been decided by a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Gongalai & Ors. ITR 331 140 (Madhya Pradesh). Keeping in view the aforesaid, as the question framed in this appeal has already been answered against the revenue in the case of Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti (Supra), we see no reason to interfere into the matter now. The appeal is accordingly, dismissed. (Rajendra Menon) Judge (Anil Sharma) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan