Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Jalandhar...

Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Jalandhar-Ii, Jalandhar v. Sh. Charanjit Singh Kanwar, The Fort, Kartarpur, Distt. Jalandhar

High Court 12 Jul 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Jalandhar-Ii, Jalandhar v. Sh. Charanjit Singh Kanwar, The Fort, Kartarpur, Distt. Jalandhar
Date of order
12 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Jalandhar-Ii, Jalandhar v. Sh. Charanjit Singh Kanwar, The Fort, Kartarpur, Distt. Jalandhar, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH Income Tax Appeal No.97 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Order: 12.07.2013 Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Jalandhar-II, Jalandhar ...Appellant Versus Sh. Charanjit Singh Kanwar, The Fort, Kartarpur, Distt. Jalandhar. ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON Present: Mr. Vivek Sethi , Advocatefor the appellant. RAJIVE BHALLA, J (Oral) Counsel for the revenue fairly concedes that the questionof law framed in the present appeal has been answered against therevenue in ITA No.195 of 2012, titled “The Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Jalandharv. Sh. Charanjit Singh Kanwar, the FortKartarpur, decided on 21.01.2013. In view of the statement made by counsel for the revenue,as question of law framed in the present appeal has been answeredagainst the appellant, in the aforesaid judgment, the appeal isdismissed, in terms thereof. (RAJIVE BHALLA) JUDGE (DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan