Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Jodhpur v. Pappu Ram Vishnoi
High Court
26 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Jodhpur v. Pappu Ram Vishnoi
Date of order
26 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Jodhpur v. Pappu Ram Vishnoi, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 56/2014
Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Jodhpur.
----Appellant
Versus
Pappu Ram Vishnoi, Prop. M/s Dara Construction Company, 11,Gold Course, Malviya Nagar, Ratanada, Jodhpur.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sunil Bhandari.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
26/10/2018
Order
In view of Circular No.3/18 dated 11.7.18 issued by theMinistry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board DirectTaxes, Government of India, New Delhi, the tax effect involved inthe present appeal being less than Rs.50 lacs, learned counselappearing for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw theappeal.
Permission is granted.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
(SANGEET LODHA),J
DJ/- 198
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue