Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Jodhpur v. Shri Amritlal Khatri
High Court
14 Nov 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Jodhpur v. Shri Amritlal Khatri
Date of order
14 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Jodhpur v. Shri Amritlal Khatri, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 130/2011
Commissioner Of Income Tax-II, Jodhpur.
----Appellant
Versus
Shri Amritlal Khatri, Proprietor, M/s Amritlal Khatri, Jaisalmer.
----Respondent
Connected with
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 106/2012
Commissioner Of Income Tax-II, Ayakar Bhawan, Paota CRoad, Jodhpur.
----Appellant
Versus
Amrit Lal Khatri, Proprietor, M/s Amrit Lal Khatri, GandhiColony, Jaisalmer.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) For Respondent(s)
: Mr. Sunil Bhandari: Mr. Abhishek Mehta forMr. Vineet Dave
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
14/11/2018
Order
In view of the Circular No.3/18 dated 11.7.18 issued by theMinistry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board ofDirect Taxes, Government of India, New Delhi, the tax effectinvolved in the present appeal being less than Rs.50 lacs, learnedcounsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission to withdrawthe appeals.
The permission is granted.
The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
(SANGEET LODHA),J
Anurag/C-1 & 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue