Commissioner Of Income-Tax — Ii, Ludhiana v. M/S Ralco Exports, Ludhiana
High Court
18 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax — Ii, Ludhiana v. M/S Ralco Exports, Ludhiana
Date of order
18 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax — Ii, Ludhiana v. M/S Ralco Exports, Ludhiana, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.
LT.A. No. 901 of 2010DATE OF DECISION: 18.01 2016
Commissioner of Income-tax — II, Ludhiana
APPELLANT
Versus
M/s Ralco Exports, Ludhiana
—... RESPONDENT
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Present:Mr. Zora Singh Klar, Advocate,Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department,for the appellant.
Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate,for the respondent.
"SRO
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J.
Mr. Zora Singh Klar, Advocate, Senior Standing Counsel for
the Income Tax Department, very fairly states that in view of Circular No,21/2015 issued by the Government of India vide letter dated 10.12.2015, the
appellant department does not want to pursue this appeal.
Dismissed as not pressed.
(SATISH KUMAR MITTAL )JUDGE
January 18, 2016
ndj
( HARINDER SINGH SIDHU )JIUDG
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue