Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Ludhiana v. M/S Saini Motors, Ludhiana
High Court
02 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Ludhiana v. M/S Saini Motors, Ludhiana
Date of order
02 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Ludhiana v. M/S Saini Motors, Ludhiana, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 149 of 2004 (O&M)Decided on : 02.02.2016.
Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Ludhiana
Versus
M/s Saini Motors, Ludhiana
... Appellant
... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITIALHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG
PRESENT: Mr. Zora Singh Klar, Advocatefor the appellant.
****
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since the taxeffect involved is446,531/-, he has instructions to withdraw the present appealin view of the circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015 issued by the C.B.D.T.,New Delhi. However, he prayed that liberty be granted to the revenue to filean application for revival of the appeal in case something survives therein.
2.Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It 1s,however, clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall not betaken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legalissue aS Claimed by the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in anappropriate case.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
February 02, 2016
smriti
(RAJ RAHUL GARG)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.