Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Ludhiana v. Sh. Shiv Parshad Aggarwal
High Court
27 Oct 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Ludhiana v. Sh. Shiv Parshad Aggarwal
Date of order
27 Oct 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Ludhiana v. Sh. Shiv Parshad Aggarwal, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ITAAA42014 (O&M)Decided on: 27.10.2016
sr. No. 330 (28)
Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Ludhiana..... AppellantVERSUS
Sh. Shiv Parshad Aggarwal
..... Respondent
CORAMHON5BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICEHON5BLE MR. JUSTICE DEBPAK SIBAL
PresentMr.Zora Singh Klar, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr.Alok Mittal, Advocate, for the respondent.<<<<<<<
S.J.VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since the
tax effect involved is Rs.1.50 lacs (approx.), he has instructions to withdrawthe present appeal in view of the circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015,issued by the C.B.D.T., New Delhi. However, he prayed that liberty begranted to the revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal in casesomething survives therein.
2 Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is,however, clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall not betaken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legalissue as Claimed by the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in anappropriate case.
| S.J. VAZIFDAR |
CHIEF JUSTICE
27 10. 2016
shamsher
| DEEPAK SIBAL |
JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking
Yes / No
Whether reportableYes / No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.