Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii, Pune v. Children's Clinic
High Court
05 Feb 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii, Pune v. Children's Clinic
Date of order
05 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii, Pune v. Children's Clinic, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1650 OF 2014WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1651 OF 2014WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1652 OF 2014WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1654 OF 2014WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1655 OF 2014WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1657 OF 2014
Commissioner of Income-Tax-II, Pune VersusChildren's Clinic
..Appellant
..Respondent
..................
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
Mr. Suyog Bhave i/by Mihir Naniwadekar for the Respondent.
.....................
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN &
MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 05, 2021.
P.C.:
Heard Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned standing counsel, revenue for
the appellant and Mr. Suyog Bhave, learned counsel for the assessee /respondent.
2.Today the appeals are listed on a praecipe filed by learnedcounsel for the appellant.
3. Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned standing counsel submits that thequantum of tax involved in these appeals are below the revised
monetary limit of Rs. 1 Crore as fixed by the Central Board of DirectTaxes by its Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019.
4. Accordingly, he seeks leave to withdraw the appeals.
5. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to theprayer made.prayer made.
6. Accordingly and in the light of the above, all the appeals aredisposed of as withdrawn.disposed of as withdrawn.
7. Refund as per Rules.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
[ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ]
Digitally signedRavindraby Ravindra M.AmberkarM.Date:Amberkar2021.02.0812:05:07+0530
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.