Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Sadar, Nagpur v. M/S Abhinav Food Products Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur
High Court
30 Sep 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Sadar, Nagpur v. M/S Abhinav Food Products Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur
Date of order
30 Sep 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Sadar, Nagpur v. M/S Abhinav Food Products Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
INCOME TAX APPEAL No.128 OF 2010
(Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Sadar, Nagpur ..vs.. M/s Abhinav Food Products Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's order
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for the appellant,Shri C.J. Thakar, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM:- J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.DATED :- 30th SEPTEMBER, 2010
In the light of the judgment of this Court in the case of Chem
Amit v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax reported in272
ITR 397,learned counsel for the appellant seeks liberty to withdraw the appeal.
Appeal allowed to be withdrawn.
Refund of court fees as per law.
JUDGE
JUDGE
pma
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue