Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Jay Chemical Industries Ltd
High Court
03 Dec 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Jay Chemical Industries Ltd
Date of order
03 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Jay Chemical Industries Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
C/TAXAP/1433/2011 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1433 of 2011
==========================================================COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IIVersusJAY CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES LTD
==========================================================
Appearance:
MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1MR TEJ SHAH(5743) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1RULE SERVED(64) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANIandHONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A. P. THAKER Date : 03/12/2018 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)
1. Ms. Mauna Bhatt, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant has submitted a note together with a communication dated 29.10.2018 of the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Judicial), for Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat, Ahmedabad, instructing her to withdraw the appeal as the tax effect is below the monetary limit of Rs.50,00,000/- and the case does not fall in the exceptional clauses as per the CBDT Circular No.3/2018 dated 11.07.2018, reserving a right to revive the appeal in case any discrepancy comes to notice at a later stage after withdrawal of the appeal as human error cannot be ruled out. She, accordingly, seeks permission to withdraw the appeal with liberty as aforesaid.
2.Permission as prayed for is granted. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
(HARSHA DEVANI, J)
(A. P. THAKER, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.