Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii v. Krishi...

Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Pipar City

High Court 08 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · rhcjodh240618

Parties

Date of order

08 Jul 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Pipar City, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 47 of 2009 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -II V/S KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI, PIPAR CITY Mr. KK BISSA, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 8.7.2009 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI GOVIND MATHUR,J. ORDER ----- The controversy involved in the present casestands already decided by this Court in Commissioner ofIncome Tax Vs. K.U.M.S., Jaisalmer reported in 216 CTR-277, and Commissioner of Income Tax, Bikaner Vs. KrishiUpaj Mandi Samiti, Gajsinghpur being D.B. Income TaxAppeal No. 4/2009 decided on 27.1.2009, out of which thejudgment in K.U.M.S., Jaisalmer has been affirmed by theHon'ble Supreme Court. In that view of the matter, this appeal doesnot involve any substantial question of law. The same is,therefore, dismissed. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /Sushil/

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.