Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii v. Missionpharma Logistics -India- Pvt. Ltd =======================================
High Court
29 Jun 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii v. Missionpharma Logistics -India- Pvt. Ltd =======================================
Date of order
29 Jun 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii v. Missionpharma Logistics -India- Pvt. Ltd =======================================, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The tax appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. [ Bela M.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 838 of 2013
=======================================COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II Versus
MISSIONPHARMA LOGISTICS -INDIA- PVT. LTD =======================================
Appearance:
MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Appellant(s) No. 1RULE UNSERVED(68) for the Opponent(s) No. 1=======================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDIandHONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ASHOKKUMAR C. JOSHI
Date : 29/06/2021ORAL ORDER(PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI)
Learned Senior Standing Counsel Mrs. Mauna M. Bhatt forthe appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present taxappeal in view of the communication dated 09.06.2021, receivedby her from the office of the Principal Commissioner of IncomeTax-1, Ahmedabad as the respondent - assessee has availed thebenefit under the Direct Tax Vivaad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on thesubstantial question of law framed by the Court at the time ofadmission of the tax appeal, the learned senior standing counselfor the appellant is permitted to withdraw the present tax appeal,as prayed for. The tax appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
[ Bela M. Trivedi, J. ]
[ A. C. Joshi, J. ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.