Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iichandigarh...

Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iichandigarh v. M/S. Nand Lal Labhu Ram,Kharar

High Court 31 Mar 2011 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

31 Mar 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iichandigarh v. M/S. Nand Lal Labhu Ram,Kharar, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Income Tax Appeal No. 163 of 2005 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. --- Income Tax Appeal No. 163 of 2005 Date of decision: 31.3.2011 Commissioner of Income Tax-IIChandigarh --- Appellant Versus M/s. Nand Lal Labhu Ram,Kharar --- Respondent CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL --- Present:Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Senior Standing Counselfor the appellant-Revenue. Mr. H.N. Mehtani, Advocatefor the respondent. --- AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. The paper-book of this case is said to have burnt in the fireincident that took place in the premises of this Court on the night of 30[th] ofJanuary, 2011. Learned counsel for the appellant has made available twocopies of paper-book to the Registry for reconstruction of the file. Thesaid copies are taken on record. The paper-book of this appeal be treatedas having been reconstructed. The appeal is dismissed. For reasons, see detailed order ofeven date passed in Income Tax Appeal No. 162 of 2005 (Commissionerof Income Tax-II, Chandigarh v. M/s. Nand Lal Labhu Ram). (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE March 31, 2011*rkmalik* (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.