Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii - Appellant(S v. The Viramgam Mercantile Co-Op Bank Ltd. - Opponent(S
High Court
16 Aug 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii - Appellant(S v. The Viramgam Mercantile Co-Op Bank Ltd. - Opponent(S
Date of order
16 Aug 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii - Appellant(S v. The Viramgam Mercantile Co-Op Bank Ltd. - Opponent(S, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The question is, accordingly, answered in the affirmative.The Tax Appeals are, accordingly, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
TAX APPEAL No. 82 of 2005
To TAX APPEAL No. 90 of 2005
For Approval and Signature:
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTAHONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI
=============================================================
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III - Appellant(s)Versus
THE VIRAMGAM MERCANTILE CO-OP BANK LTD. - Opponent(s)
=============================================================
Appearance :
MR MANISH R BHATT for Appellant No(s).: 1. MR S N DIVATIA for Respondent No(s).: 1. ====================================================
CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
and
Date : 16/08/2005
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI)
1.Heard Mr. Manish R. Bhatt, learned Senior Standing Counsel for theappellant-Revenue and Mr. S.N. Divatia, learned advocate for therespondent-assessee.
1.It is an accepted position that the controversy raised by the questionframed at the time of admission stands concluded by a decision of thisCourt rendered in Tax Appeal No. 208 of 2003 and the cognate mattersrendered on 29.07.2005, 01.08.2005 and 09.08.2005 in the case ofCommissioner of Income-Tax V/s. The Baroda Peoples Co-operative BankLimited.
1.Therefore, it is held that the Tribunal was justified in law inallowing deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-Tax Act,1961 on interest income as being attributable to the business ofbanking. The question is, accordingly, answered in the affirmative.The Tax Appeals are, accordingly, dismissed. There shall be no orderas to costs.
1.Registry to place copies of this judgment in all connected matters.
Hitesh
(D.A.MEHTA,J.) (H.N.DEVANI,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.