Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Chennai...

Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Chennai v. M/S.royal Park Hotels Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-83

High Court 12 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Chennai v. M/S.royal Park Hotels Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-83
Date of order
12 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Chennai v. M/S.royal Park Hotels Pvt. Ltd., Chennai-83, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 12.10.2018 The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAMand The Honourable Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN Tax Case Appeal No.856 of 2010 Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Chennai....Appellant/AppellantVsM/s.Royal Park Hotels Pvt. Ltd.,Chennai-83 ...Respondent/ Respondent Prayer:APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961 against the order dated 08.1.2010 in ITANo.1688/Mds/2009 on the file of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal Chennai 'D' Bench for the assessment year 2006-07and against the order of the commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-V Chennai 34,dt.09.03.2009,made in ITA .nO.180/2008-2009 for the Assessment year 2006-2007 andagainst the order of the income Tax officer company ward v(1), Chennai,DT 11.12.2008 against the PA/GIR NO:AACCR7849H. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. This appeal by the Revenue challenges the orderpassed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decidedthe issue in favour of the assessee. 3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeal on accountof low tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated11.7.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. 4. In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissedas withdrawn and the substantial question of law framed isleft open. In the event the tax effect is above thethreshold limit fixed in the said circular, liberty is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court torestore the appeal to be heard and decided on merits. //True Copy// Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) Sub Assistant Registrar To The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'D' Bench. 2.The commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-V Chennai 34.TCA.No.856 of 2010 ASK(15/11/2018)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan