Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Chennai v. Shri Sudharshan Kumar Rungta
High Court
09 Nov 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Chennai v. Shri Sudharshan Kumar Rungta
Date of order
09 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Chennai v. Shri Sudharshan Kumar Rungta, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are leftopen.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAMAND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
TAX CASE APPEAL NO.905 OF 2010
Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Chennai...Appellant/Appellant
Vs
Shri Sudharshan Kumar Rungta,Proprietor M/s.Raunaq SteelIndustries...Respondent/Respondent
APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 30.3.2010 in ITA No.1346/Mds/2009 on thefile of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai 'B' Bench forthe assessment year 2003-04.
Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
2. This appeal by the Revenue challenges the order passed bythe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decided the issue infavour of the assessee.
3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeal on account oflow tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
4. In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are leftopen. In the event the tax effect is above the threshold limitfixed in the said circular under exceptional clauses mentionedin the circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue to make a
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
mention to this Court to restore the appeal to be heard anddecided on merits. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rs
To1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'B' Bench.2.The Commissioner of Income Tax III,Chennai.
3.The Income Tax Officer(OSD)Company Circle-V(3), Chennai.
+1cc to Mr.M.Swaminathan, Advocate, S.R.No.76958+1cc to Mr.G.Baskar, Advocate, S.R.No.76950
NMI(CO)CS/07/12/2018
TCA.No.905 of 2010
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.