Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Jaipur v. M/S. Laxminath Infrastructure (P) Ltd., Churu
High Court
17 Nov 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Jaipur v. M/S. Laxminath Infrastructure (P) Ltd., Churu
Date of order
17 Nov 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Jaipur v. M/S. Laxminath Infrastructure (P) Ltd., Churu, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sanjay
D.B. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.189/2014
Commissioner of Income Tax-III, JaipurVs.M/s. Laxminath Infrastructure (P) Ltd., Churu
DATE OF ORDER : 17.11.2015
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHURHON'BLE MISS JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Mr. K.K. Bissa, for the appellant
...
By the judgment impugned, the learned Income TaxAppellate Tribunal by relying upon the judgment of this Courtarrived at the conclusion that in case the assessee shows betterresult during the year under consideration as compared to pastyear, then there is no need for making any further addition. Thefinding arrived by the Tribunal is in consonance with the settled law,therefore, no addition in the income could have been made by theAssessing Officer. The Tribunal rightly declared the addition madeas erroneous. The appeal does not involve any substantial questionof law, hence, dismissed.
, J. , J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.