Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Himans...

Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Himanshu J Shah....opponent(S

High Court 16 Aug 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Himanshu J Shah....opponent(S
Date of order
16 Aug 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Himanshu J Shah....opponent(S, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

O/TAXAP/50/2010 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD TAX APPEAL No 50 of 2010 ================================================================ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III....Appellant(s) Versus HIMANSHU J SHAH....Opponent(s) ================================================================ Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT as ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1 ================================================================ CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIand HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI Date : 13/06/2011 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) law : Tax appeal is admitted for consideration of following question of “Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in confirming the order passed by CIT(A) in directing to tax the income earned from trading in shares under the head 'LTCG/STCG' as shown by the assessee instead of taxing it under the head 'Income From Business & Profession'?” (Akil Kureshi,J.) (raghu) (Ms. Sonia Gokani,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan