Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Koodathil Kallyatan Ambujakshan
High Court
04 Feb 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Koodathil Kallyatan Ambujakshan
Date of order
04 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Koodathil Kallyatan Ambujakshan, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.48 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.53 OF 2008
Commissioner of Income Tax-III ..Appellant
Versus
Koodathil Kallyatan Ambujakshan ..Respondent
----
Mrs.P.P.Bhosale with Mr.B.M.Chatterji for the
appellant.
Mr.P.Naik with Mandar Vaidya for respondent.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 4.2.2008
PC
1. Heard parties.
2. According to the learned Counsel the additional
question as framed would not arise from the order of
the Tribunal. That issue can be looked into when
the matter comes up for admission. In the light of
that, Chamber summons is made absolute in terms of
prayer clause-(a). Amendment to be carried out
within a period of one week. Place the appeal on
board after 2 weeks.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue