Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S. Whirlpool Of India Ltd. (Kelvinator Of India Ltd
High Court
19 Jan 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S. Whirlpool Of India Ltd. (Kelvinator Of India Ltd
Date of order
19 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S. Whirlpool Of India Ltd. (Kelvinator Of India Ltd, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The said appeal having been dismissed, the present appeal will not survive and thus, is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Judgment delivered on: 19.01.2011
ITA No.46/2004
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III
..... APPELLANT
Vs
M/s. WHIRLPOOL OF INDIA LTD. (KELVINATOR OF INDIA LTD.) ..... RESPONDENT
Advocates who appeared in this case:For the Appellant : Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Advocate For the Respondent : Ms. Kavita Jha, Mr. Amit Sachdeva & Mr. Somnath Shukla, Advocates
CORAM :-
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may
be allowed to see the judgment ?
2. To be referred to Reporters or not ?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported
in the Digest ?
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J (ORAL)
1. This appeal arising from ITA 39/1999 between the same parties (M/s. Whirlpool of India Ltd. was earlier known as Kelvinator of India Ltd.) was directed to be heard alongwith ITA 39/1999. The said appeal having been dismissed, the present appeal will not survive and thus, is accordingly dismissed.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.
JANUARY 19, 2011 yg
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.