Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii } v. Shripatrao Kadam Smruti Pratishthan }

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1527 OF 2012WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1589 OF 2012WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 104 OF 2013WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 131 OF 2013WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 133 OF 2013WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 135 OF 2013 Commissioner of Income Tax-III}versusShripatrao Kadam Smruti Pratishthan} }Appellant}Respondent Mr. Tejveer Singh for the Appellant.Mr. Mandar Vaidya for the Respondent. CORAM :-S.C.DHARMADHIKARI &A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATED :-NOVEMBER 15, 2014 P.C. :- These six Appeals involve questions and identical to the one covered and dealt with in Income Tax Appeal Nos. 36 of 2012, 37 of 2012 and 39 of 2012, which came to be dismissed by this Court on 10[th] June, 2014. The Division Bench, to which one of us (S. C. Dharmathikari, J.) was a party was dealing with identical situation and identical controversy and questions. We cannot deviate or depart from this order and because no distinguishing features have been pointed out. In these circumstances, each one of these Appeals do not raise any substantial question of law. These are dismissed. We have also taken the same view in Income Tax Appeal No. 854 of 2012 decided on 12[th ]September, 2014 and Income Tax Appeal No. 1426 of 2012 and connected matters on 31[st] October, 2014. (A.A.SAYED, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)