Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iimadurai v. Shri.r.bhaaragthwaj39, Harvey Nagar Ii Street,Arasaradi, Madurai β 625 016
High Court
28 Oct 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iimadurai v. Shri.r.bhaaragthwaj39, Harvey Nagar Ii Street,Arasaradi, Madurai β 625 016
Date of order
28 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iimadurai v. Shri.r.bhaaragthwaj39, Harvey Nagar Ii Street,Arasaradi, Madurai β 625 016, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, keeping the questions of law alive for determination in an appropriate case, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below β read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order β as passed by the High Court
TC.(A)No.438 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.10.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICEANITA SUMANTHandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN
TC(A).No.438 of 2011
Commissioner of Income Tax -IIMadurai
.. Appellant
vs
Shri.R.Bhaaragthwaj39, Harvey Nagar II Street,Arasaradi, Madurai β 625 016... Respondent
PRAYER: APPEAL filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order dated 07.04.2011 passed in I.T.A.No.166/Mds/2011 for the Assessment Year 2007-08 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, Chennai.
For Appellant: Mr.J.Narayanasamy Senior Standing Counsel
For Respondent: Mr.R.Sivaraman
DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J.
TC.(A)No.438 of 2011
and
G. ARUL MURUGAN.,J
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the court was delivered by Dr.ANITA SUMANTH.,J)
The challenge in this appeal is to an order dated 07.04.2011 passed
in I.T.A.No.166/Mds/2011 for the Assessment Year 2007-08.
2. Mr.J.Narayanasamy, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the Income Tax Department draws attention to an order passed on 10.01.2011 for Assessment Year 2007-08 under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1971 where penalty has been quantified at a sum of Rs.1,78,20,561/-. However, on account of low tax effect per Circular bearing No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024, he does not wish to pursue this appeal and seeks withdrawal of the same.
3. Hence, keeping the questions of law alive for determination in
an appropriate case, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Index:Yes/NoSpeaking orderNeutral Citation:Yessl
[A.S.M., J] [G.A.M., J] 28.10.2024
TC.No.438 of 2011
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CAβclient relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.