Commissioner Of Income Tax Iitiruchirapalli v. Https://Hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/Hcservices

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARIANDTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH Tax Case Appeal No.1473 of 2010 Commissioner of Income Tax IITiruchirapalli. Appellant Vs. M/s.Talco Trichy Tannery Effluent Co (TALCO)Tanners Mansion,No.257, Pudukottai Road, Sambattu, Tiruchirapalli 620 007.Respondent Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income TaxAct, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Madras 'D' Bench, Chennai, dated 19.3.2010 made in ITANo.1696/Mds/2009 against the order of the Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Tiruchirapalli, dated 11/09/2009 and made inC.No.7162E(29)/2004/CIT-II/TRY, against the order of the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, Bench 'C' Chennai, dated 13.03.2009 andmade in ITA No.181/mds/09. For Appellant : Mr.M.Swaminathan Senior Standing Counsel For respondent : Dr.A.Thyagarajan, Senior Counsel for Mr.S.Rameshkumar This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue callingin question the correctness of the order passed by the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Chennai, dated 19.3.2010 madein ITA No.1696/Mds/2009, by raising the following substantialquestion of law:"(i) Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case the Income Tax Appellate https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Tribunal was right by itself directing the grantingof registration under Section 12AA of the Income TaxAct to the company when the conditions as regardsthe genuineness of the activities carried on by theassessee was not in any manner substantiated by theassessee?" 2. When the matter is taken up for admission, the learnedStanding Counsel brought to our notice the Circular instructionissued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes vide CircularNo.3/2018 dated 11.7.2018 wherein it is stipulated that appealsshall not be filed/pursued by the Department before the HighCourt in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs. 3. In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be lessthan the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeal filedby the Revenue is dismissed as not pressed, keeping open thesubstantial question of law for determination in an appropriatecase. ssk. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To1. The Commissioner of Income Tax II Tiruchirapalli. 2. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle IV, No.44, Williams Road, Cantonment, Trichy 620 001. 3. The Registrar, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'C' Bench, Chennai. 4. The Registrar, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'D' Bench, Chennai. kak(11/03/2019) TCA No.1474 of 2010