Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation v. Joint Stock Company Zangas
High Court
17 Dec 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation v. Joint Stock Company Zangas
Date of order
17 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation v. Joint Stock Company Zangas, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly disposed of as not pressed in the light of the Circular dated 11th July, 2018.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/TAXAP/163/2017 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/TAX APPEAL NO. 163 of 2017
==========================================================
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATIONVersusJOINT STOCK COMPANY ZANGAS
==========================================================Appearance:MR.VARUN K.PATEL(3802) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1MR MANISH J SHAH(1320) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANIand
HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A. P. THAKER
Date : 17/12/2018
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)
1. Heard Mr.Varun Patel, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant and Mr.Manish Shah, learned advocate for the respondent.
2. It is an admitted position between the parties that the tax effect involved in this appeal is less than Rs.50,00,000/-. Under the circumstances, in the light of the Circular No.3/2018 dated 11th July, 2018 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, which provides that no appeal wherein the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs.50,00,000/- shall be filed before the High Court and has also been made retrospectively applicable to pending appeals, the learned senior standing counsel for the appellant does not press the present appeal.
3. The appeal is accordingly disposed of as not pressed in the light of the Circular dated 11th July, 2018. However, in case there is
any error in the computation of the tax effect involved or if for any reason, the circular is not applicable, it would be open for the appellant to seek revival of the appeal.
(HARSHA DEVANI, J)
Vijay
(A. P. THAKER, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.