Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax (It-1), Inter...

Commissioner Of Income Tax (It-1), International Taxation, Newdelhi v. M/S Cameron (Singapore) Pvt.ltd

High Court 13 Dec 2024 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

13 Dec 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax (It-1), International Taxation, Newdelhi v. M/S Cameron (Singapore) Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 5 case law →

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 992/2024 In D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.02/2024 Commissioner Of Income Tax (It-1), International Taxation, NewDelhi ----Petitioner Versus M/s Cameron (Singapore) Pvt.ltd, C/o Cameroon ManufacturingIndia Pvt. Ltd. Iiird Floor, Tidel Park, Vilankurichi Road, CivilAerodrome Post, Coimbatore, Tamilandu- 641014 ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shantanu Sharma For Respondent(s): HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANIOrder 13/12/2024 Heard on the restoration application as well as on theapplication (I.A. No.1975/2024) filed under Section 5 of theLimitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the restorationapplication. For the reasons mentioned in the applications, the same areallowed. The delay in filing the restoration application is condonedand the D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.02/2024 is ordered to berestored to its original number. Office to proceed further. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Upendra Pratap Singh /37

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.