Commissioner Of Income Tax (It)-2 v. M/S. Dassault Systems Solidworks Corporation
High Court
28 Jun 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (It)-2 v. M/S. Dassault Systems Solidworks Corporation
Date of order
28 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax (It)-2 v. M/S. Dassault Systems Solidworks Corporation, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Nagrajsubmits that there is a review petition pending in the Supreme Court andtherefore, the Court may dispose the appeal with liberty to appellant toapproach this Court to either revive the appeal or file a fresh appeal in casethe review petition is allowed in favour of Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 302 OF 2018
Commissioner of Income Tax (IT)-2
Vs.M/s. Dassault Systems Solidworks CorporationC/o BMR and Associates LLP
….. Appellant
….. Respondent
Ms. Sushma Nagaraj a/w Ms. Kinjal Patel, for Appellant.Mr. Paras Savla a/w Mr. Pratik Poddar, for Respondents.
DATED :JUNE 28, 2023
P.C.
1.Ms. Nagraj in all fairness, as an officer of the Court, submits that theissue in this appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of the Apex Court
in[1]Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited Vs.Commissioner of Income Tax and another. At the same time, Ms. Nagrajsubmits that there is a review petition pending in the Supreme Court andtherefore, the Court may dispose the appeal with liberty to appellant toapproach this Court to either revive the appeal or file a fresh appeal in casethe review petition is allowed in favour of Revenue.
2.Appeal disposed with liberty as prayed for.
(FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J)
1(2022) 3 Supreme Court Cases 321
(K.R.SHRIRAM, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.