Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax (It)-3, Mumba...

Commissioner Of Income Tax (It)-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Msm Satelite (Singapore) Pte. Ltd

High Court 29 Jun 2022 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

29 Jun 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax (It)-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Msm Satelite (Singapore) Pte. Ltd, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned bySHRADDHASHRADDHAKAMLESHKAMLESHTALEKARTALEKARDate:2022.07.0416:17:53+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1283 OF 2022IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L.) NO. 577 OF 2016 Commissioner of Income Tax (IT)-3,Mumbai Vs.M/s. MSM Satelite (Singapore)Pte. Ltd. .. Appellant .... Respondent **** Mr Suresh Kumar for appellant. Mr. Sameer G. Dalal for respondent. **** CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR ANDABHAY AHUJA, JJ.DATE : 29[th] JUNE 2022 PC : 1.Reply to the application seeking restoration of the appeal istaken on record. 2.We have heard the learned counsel for parties on the issueof restoration of the appeal, dismissed in terms of Rule 986 of the Bombay High Court Original Side Rules, by order dated 1[st]September 2016. 3.We are satisfed with the grounds in the application andthose urged at the time of hearing and accordingly allow theapplication. 4.The appeal is restored, subject to payment of costs ofRs.5,000/- to be deposited in the Advocates’ Welfare FundRs.5,000/- to be deposited in the Advocates’ Welfare Fund 5.Interim Application is disposed of. 6.List the appeal on 13[th] July 2022. [ABHAY AHUJA, J.] [DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.]

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.