Commissioner Of Income Tax (It)-3 v. M/S. Mckinsey & Company, Inc. Singapore,Pte Ltd
High Court
17 Dec 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax (It)-3 v. M/S. Mckinsey & Company, Inc. Singapore,Pte Ltd
Date of order
17 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax (It)-3 v. M/S. Mckinsey & Company, Inc. Singapore,Pte Ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(Private Secretary)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 461 OF 2016
Commissioner of Income Tax (IT)-3..Appellant
Versus
M/s. Mckinsey & Company, Inc. Singapore,PTE Ltd..Respondent
...................
Mr. Sigmund Gracias i/by Charanjeet Chanderpal for the AppellantMr. Sigmund Gracias i/by Charanjeet Chanderpal for the Appellant
Mr. Poras Kaka, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Divesh Chawla & Ms.Prachi Garg i/by DSK Legal for the RespondentMr. Poras Kaka, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Divesh Chawla & Ms.Prachi Garg i/by DSK Legal for the Respondent
...................
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 17, 2018.
P.C.:
1.Learned counsel for the Revenue sought permission towithdraw the appeal since he is under instructions not topress the appeal. Permission granted. The appeal standsdisposed of as withdrawn.
[ M.S. SANKLECHA, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue