Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, Nagpur v. M/S Pioneer Constructions, Bajajnagar, Nagpur
High Court
01 Dec 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, Nagpur v. M/S Pioneer Constructions, Bajajnagar, Nagpur
Date of order
01 Dec 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, Nagpur v. M/S Pioneer Constructions, Bajajnagar, Nagpur, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: In view thereof the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.91 OF 2009
Commissioner OF Income Tax-IV, Nagpur
-vs-
M/s Pioneer Constructions, Bajajnagar, Nagpur
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's ordersCourt's or Judge's Orders.or directions and Registrar's orders.
Shri Aand Parchure, Advocate for appellants.
CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND N. B. SURYAWANSHI, JJ.
DATE : December 01, 2020
During pendency of the appeal the appellant/Revenuehas filed pursis stating therein that in view of CircularNo.17/2019 the monetary limit below which appeal was not tobe filed has been enhanced to Rs.1 crore. On that count thepresent appeal would be required to be withdrawn as the taxeffect involved is below the said limit. The pursis has beensigned by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Nagpuras well as by the learned counsel for the appellant.
In view thereof the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Court fees be refunded as per Rules.
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.