In Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv Through: Counsel (Appearance Not Given v. Income Tax Settlement Commission & Anr, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal.
Decision: In view of the above statement, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~9.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 5343/2014
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV Through: Counsel (Appearance not given)
..... Petitioner
versus
INCOME TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION & ANR.
..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Garima Goel, Advocate.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 25.04.2016
CM No. 10632 of 2014(exemption)
1. Allowed subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 5343/2014
2. Learned counsel for the Respondent No. 2 informs the Court that the present writ petition is directed against the interim order passed by the Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC). However, the final order passed by the ITSC is against the Respondent No.2. As a result the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
3. In view of the above statement, the writ petition is dismissed as having
become infructuous.
APRIL 25, 2016/mg
S.MURALIDHAR, J
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue