In Commissioner Of Income Tax- Iv v. Keyur Parikh, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/TAXAP/1002/2014 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/TAX APPEAL NO. 1002 of 2014
==========================================================
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- IV
VersusKEYUR PARIKH
==========================================================
Appearance:MRS MAUNA BHATT (3286) for the Appellant(s) No. 1RULE SERVED(64) for the Opponent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA
andHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIADate : 26/04/2021
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA)
Learned advocate Mrs.Mauna Bhatt appearing for the appellant-Commissioner of Income-Tax, seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal upon instructions received in writing from the Department. In this regard, learned advocate for the appellant produced on record communication dated 23[rd] April, 2021 from the office of Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-III, Ahmedabad in which it is communicated that assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme for the Assessment Year 2008-09.
2.The said communication is taken on record.
3.Permission as prayed for to withdraw the appeal is granted. Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn.
(R.M.CHHAYA, J)
ANUP
(N.V.ANJARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.