Commissioner Of Income Tax Ivchennai v. Shri.a.manohar Prasad
High Court
30 Nov 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax Ivchennai v. Shri.a.manohar Prasad
Date of order
30 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax Ivchennai v. Shri.a.manohar Prasad, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the instant case, the tax effect is less than themonetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeal is dismissed asnot pressed, preserving the substantial question of law fordetermination in an appropriate case.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30.11.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARIANDTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
Commissioner of Income Tax IVChennai.
...Appellant Vs.
Shri.A.Manohar Prasad...Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income TaxAct, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Madras 'B' Bench, Chennai, dated 22.5.2009 made in ITANo.2155/Mds/2008 and appeal against the order of Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals) VI 121, M.GRoad, Chennai-34 made inITA.No.193/06-07 dt:25/07/2008 and appeal against the order ofIncome Tax Officer, Media Ward-II, 121, M.G.Road, Chennai-34,dt:28/12/2007 Assessment order for the Assessment year 2004-05,in GIR.No. & PAN.No. dt:20/12/2006.
J U D G M E N T
(Delivered by DR.VINEET KOTHARI,J)
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue callingin question the correctness of the order passed by the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench, Chennai, dated22.5.2009 made in ITA No.2155/Mds/2008, by raising the followingsubstantial question of law:
"Whether, on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the appellate Tribunalwas justified in holding that the remuneration ofRs.84,00,000/- received by the assessee as Directorof the Company was assessable under the head "incomefrom Other Sources" and not under the head"Salaries" ignoring all relevant material?"
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. When the matter is taken up for admission, the learnedStanding Counsel brought to our notice the Circular instructionissued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes vide CircularNo.3/2018 dated 11.7.2018 wherein it is stipulated that appealsshall not be filed/pursued by the Department before the HighCourt in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs.
3. In the instant case, the tax effect is less than themonetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeal is dismissed asnot pressed, preserving the substantial question of law fordetermination in an appropriate case.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Income Tax Appellant Tribunal,Madras 'B' Bench, Chennai.2.The Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal-VI,121, M.G.Road,Chennai-34
3.The Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal-VI,121, M.G.Road, New Block, Room 314, IIIrd floor,Chennai-34.
+1cc to Mr.S.Premalatha, Advocate, S.R.No.82058
TCA No.1345 of 2009KJI(CO)GSP(07/01/2019)
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.