Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jabalpur v....

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jabalpur v. M/S. Royal Construction Co. P. Ltd., Durg

High Court 06 Sep 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

06 Sep 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jabalpur v. M/S. Royal Construction Co. P. Ltd., Durg, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2.In this circumstances, we are left with no other option except to dismiss the MCC for want of prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Bini NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 203 of 1994 Commissioner of Income Tax, Jabalpur ---- Applicant Versus M/s. Royal Construction Co. P. Ltd., Durg ---- Respondent For appellantFor Respondent/ : None present: None present Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker DiwakerHon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai Order On Board Per P. Diwaker, J 06.09.2016 None appears for the applicant even when the case is taken up for hearing in the second round. 2.In this circumstances, we are left with no other option except to dismiss the MCC for want of prosecution. 3.Accordingly, the MCC is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Pritinker Diwaker) (Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) JUDGE JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.