Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jabalpur v....

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jabalpur v. Swapnil Mongia

High Court 30 Apr 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jabalpur v. Swapnil Mongia
Date of order
30 Apr 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jabalpur v. Swapnil Mongia, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Sharma, counsel for the respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whether approved for reporting: Yes / No.

Decision: Reena Mongia), this petition is also dismissed on similar terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : AT JABALPUR M.A.I.T. No : 110 of 2004 Commissioner of Income Tax, Jabalpur - V/s -Swapnil Mongia Present :Hon’ble Shri Justice Rajendra Menon.Hon’ble Justice (Smt.) Vimla Jain. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Sanjay Lal, Shri S. Dharmadhikari, Shri SanjeevTuli and Shri B.S. Thakur, counsel for the appellant. Shri L.L. Sharma, counsel for the respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whether approved for reporting: Yes / No. O R D E R 30/04/2014 For the reasons stated in the common order passed by us today in M.A.I.T. No. 91/2004 (Commissioner of Income Tax, Jabalpur Vs. Reena Mongia), this petition is also dismissed on similar terms. 2-A copy of the order passed in M.A.I.T. No. 91/2004 be retained in this file. ( RAJENDRA MENON ) ( SMT. VIMLA JAIN ) J U D G E J U D G E dm/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan