Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. M/S Garvita Exim Ltd
High Court
21 Aug 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. M/S Garvita Exim Ltd
Date of order
21 Aug 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. M/S Garvita Exim Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal iscovered by the low tax Circular and is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 655 / 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur-II, Jaipur.
----Appellant
Versus
M/S Garvita Exim Ltd., 501, Rajputana Tower, A-27-B, Shanti Path,Tilak Nagar, Jaipur.
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Appellant(s) : Mr. R.B. Mathur with Ms. Meenal Ghiya. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakul Khurana for Mr. Sanjay Jhanwar.
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGHJudgment
21/08/2017
Counsel for the respondent contended that the AssessingOfficer has shown total income of Rs. 65 lacs. However, Mr. Mathurhas disputed the same according to him amount shown is 85 lacs.
In our considered opinion the original amount which hasbeen shown the A.O. is required to be accepted. The appeal iscovered by the low tax Circular and is accordingly dismissed.
However, liberty is granted to revive the matter is case ofdifficulty.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J.
(K.S. JHAVERI),J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue