Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. M/S Rama Handicrafts, Nahargarh Road, Jaipur
High Court
02 Aug 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. M/S Rama Handicrafts, Nahargarh Road, Jaipur
Date of order
02 Aug 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. M/S Rama Handicrafts, Nahargarh Road, Jaipur, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 455 / 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur-II, Jaipur
----Appellant
Versus
M/S Rama Handicrafts, Nahargarh Road, Jaipur
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Appellant(s) : Mr. R.B. MathurFor Respondent(s) : Mr. N.L. Agarwal
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
02/08/2017
The application (24850/17) filed by the department aftermore than eight years cannot be allowed. The mistake which hasbeen committed by the department is of serious nature. Thejudgment passed by the Tribunal was not challenged by way ofseparate appeals. Though in the top of memo of appeal, it hasbeen shown to be against order passed in ITA No. 1256/JP/2008but the said order was not challenged by the revenue which isstated to be mistake while taking print out from the computer.
We have to look at the cause title and in the cause title ofthe appeal, it is against order passed in ITA No. 1119/JP/2008 andis not a default then such mistake cannot be allowed to becorrected after eight years.
In that view of the matter, the prayer of department
deserves to be rejected. The same is rejected and application(24850/17) stands dismissed.
The other application (23183/17) of the assessee is allowed.
The appeal is covered by the CBDT circular dated 10/12/2015 andstands disposed of.
(INDERJEET SINGH)J.
(K.S.JHAVERI)J.
A.Sharma/128
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.