Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, J...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. M/S. State Bank Bikaner & Jaipur, Jaipur

High Court 16 May 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. M/S. State Bank Bikaner & Jaipur, Jaipur
Date of order
16 May 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. M/S. State Bank Bikaner & Jaipur, Jaipur, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Kasliwal, for the respondent. **** Learned counsel for the respondenthas raised an objection that before filingthe present appeal, permission was notgranted by the Committee Of Disputes(forshort 'the C.O.D.') of the appellant,therefore, this appeal is incompetent and thesame may be dismissed as such...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

{1} DB INCOME TAX APPEAL 173/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPURJUDGMENT D.B. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.173/2011 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPUR-II, JAIPURVs. M/s. STATE BANK BIKANER & JAIPUR, JAIPUR DATE:16.05.2012 '-HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAINIHON'BLE MISS JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI Mr. R.B. Mathur with Mr. Nikhil Simlote, for the appellant.Mr. P.K. Kasliwal, for the respondent. **** Learned counsel for the respondenthas raised an objection that before filingthe present appeal, permission was notgranted by the Committee Of Disputes(forshort 'the C.O.D.') of the appellant,therefore, this appeal is incompetent and thesame may be dismissed as such.2.So far as procedure for filing appealafter obtaining permission from the C.O.D. isconcerned, the same has not been disputed byMr. R.B. Mathur, learned counsel appearing onbehalf of appellant, but he has submittedthat he is not aware about the permissiongranted by the C.O.D. so far as present caseis concerned. He, therefore, submitted thatin case, statement of the learned counsel for {2} DB INCOME TAX APPEAL 173/2011 respondent is found to be incorrect, then aliberty may be granted to him to file anapplication for revival of the appeal. 3.Prayer of the learned counsel forappellant appears tobereasonable, therefore, the same is allowed. 4.The appeal is, accordingly, dismissedwith liberty to the appellant, as prayed for. (BELA M. TRIVEDI),J. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN-I),J. /KKC/ Certificate: All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in thejudgment/order being emailed.KAMLESH KUMARP.A.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan