Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, J...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. Sahitya Sadawart Samiti, A-12 Shastri Nagar, Jaipur

High Court 19 Dec 2017 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

19 Dec 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur v. Sahitya Sadawart Samiti, A-12 Shastri Nagar, Jaipur, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The review petition is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR D.B. Civil Review No. 133 / 2017 Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur-II, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus Sahitya Sadawart Samiti, A-12 Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Daksh Pareek for Mr. Sameer JainFor Respondent(s) : Mr. Lokesh Taylor for Mr. M. Gargeiya _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH Order 19/12/2017 Delay in filing the review petition is condoned. Theapplication u/s 5 of the Limitation Act is allowed. The review petition is misconceived. The registration isgranted from the date of application and not from the year 1988,therefore, the review is uncalled for. The review petition is accordingly dismissed. (INDERJEET SINGH)J. (K.S.JHAVERI)J. A.Sharma/2

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.