Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur -Iii,...

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur -Iii, Jaipur v. M/S Okay Diagnostic Research Centre (P) Ltd

High Court 25 Jul 2017 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

25 Jul 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur -Iii, Jaipur v. M/S Okay Diagnostic Research Centre (P) Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal stands dismissed in default.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 128 / 2002 Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur -III, Jaipur ----Appellant Versus M/s Okay Diagnostic Research Centre (P) Ltd., 4, Vivekanand Marg, Jaipur ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sameer Jain. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.M. Ranka, Senior Counsel Assisted with Mr. N.K. Jain. _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH Order 25/07/2017 Affidavit is warranted from the Department which the officer is not filing. Mr. Sameer Jain, counsel for the appellant requestsfor time, which we decline. The appeal stands dismissed in default. The same be restored if application is moved along withaffidavit withing 30 days. (INDERJEET SINGH),J. (K.S. JHAVERI),J. Mohit Grover

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.