Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Jaipur v. La...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Jaipur v. Laxman Parasar

High Court 14 Aug 2012 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

14 Aug 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Jaipur v. Laxman Parasar, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANBENCH AT JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. CIVIL MISC.RESTORATION APPLICATIONNO.458/2012 IN D.B. CIVIL MISC. RESTORATION APPLICATIONNO.410/2009 IN D.B. INCOME-TAX REFERENCE NO.5/2004 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAIPUR Vs.LAXMAN PARASAR DATE:14.08.2012 '-HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAINIHON'BLE MISS JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI Ms. Parinitoo Jain, for applicant/appellant. **** Defect No.3 has been removed as Court fee has been paid of application underSection 5 of the Limitation Act.Defect No.4 is over ruled. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and afterconsideringhersubmissions and for the reasons mentioned inthe applications, dulysupportedbyaffidavits, delay in filing the restorationapplication is condoned and D.B. Civil Misc.Restoration Application No.410/2009 isrestored to its original number. Both the applications stand allowed. (BELA M. TRIVEDI),J. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN-I),J./KKC/ Certificate: All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in thejudgment/order being emailed. KAMLESH KUMARP.A.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.