Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur v. Shri Vivekgupta
High Court
31 Oct 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur v. Shri Vivekgupta
Date of order
31 Oct 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur v. Shri Vivekgupta, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Consequently, the appeal is, hereby, dismissed inlimine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANJAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
D.B. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 418/2011
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPUR VS. SHRI VIVEKGUPTA.
Date: 31.10.2011
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ARUN MISHRA'HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN-I
Mr. R.B. Mathur, for the appellant.
Heard counsel appearing on behalf of theappellant.
The question involved in this appeal is with regardto setting aside order of imposition of penalty under Section271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Penalty of Rs.5,40,000/-, which was imposed by the Assessing Officer, hasbeen deleted by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in separateproceedings. The ITAT has recorded a finding of fact thatthere is nothing on record to establish that the assessee hasfurnished inaccurate particulars of income or has concealedthe income.
In view of the aforesaid finding recorded by theITAT, we find that the order passed by learned ITAT does notcall for any interference.
No substantial question of law is involved in thisappeal. Consequently, the appeal is, hereby, dismissed inlimine.
(NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN-I),J. (ARUN MISHRA),CJ.
Manoj, S.No. S.40.“All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated inthe judgment/order being emailed.” MANOJ NARWANI, JUNIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.